# 13. Performance Measurement¶

In this section, we show some tips on how Bodo’s performance can be measured.

To obtain accurate performance measurements, it is important to keep following points in mind when trying to determine running times:

Every program has overhead and one may need a large data set in order to get useful measurement.

Performance can vary from one run to another. Several measurements are always needed.

It is important to have not just one test but instead a sequence of tests of increasing size in order to see how the program behaves with problems of increasing size.

Running on 1, 2 or more processors is important as more than one factor can impact.

For interesting computation, it is useful to consider simple programs. Complex program are impacted by multiple factors and their performance harder to understand.

Long computation typically give more reliable running time information.

Since Bodo decorated functions are JIT-compiled, the compilation time is non-negligible but it only happens once. To avoid measuring compilation time, place timers inside the functions. For example:

```
"""
calc_pi.py: computes the value of Pi using Monte-Carlo Integration
"""
import numpy as np
import bodo
import time
n = 2 * 10**8
def calc_pi(n):
t1 = time.time()
x = 2 * np.random.ranf(n) - 1
y = 2 * np.random.ranf(n) - 1
pi = 4 * np.sum(x**2 + y**2 < 1) / n
print("Execution time:", time.time()-t1, "\nresult:", pi)
return pi
bodo_calc_pi = bodo.jit(calc_pi)
print("python:")
calc_pi(n)
print("bodo:")
bodo_calc_pi(n)
```

The output of this code is as follows:

```
python:
Execution time: 5.060443162918091
result: 3.14165914
bodo:
Execution time: 2.165610068012029
result: 3.14154512
```

Bodo’s parallel speedup can be measured similarly:

```
"""
calc_pi.py: computes the value of Pi using Monte-Carlo Integration
"""
import numpy as np
import bodo
import time
@bodo.jit
def calc_pi(n):
t1 = time.time()
x = 2 * np.random.ranf(n) - 1
y = 2 * np.random.ranf(n) - 1
pi = 4 * np.sum(x**2 + y**2 < 1) / n
print("Execution time:", time.time()-t1, "\nresult:", pi)
return pi
calc_pi(2 * 10**8)
```

Launched on four parallel cores:

```
$ mpiexec -n 4 python calc_pi.py
Execution time: 0.5736249439651147
result: 3.14161474
```

And the time it takes can be compared with python performance. Here, we have a `5.06/0.57 ~= 9x`

parallel speedup.

You can also have multiple timers inside a function to see how much time each section takes:

```
"""
calc_pi.py: computes the value of Pi using Monte-Carlo Integration
"""
import numpy as np
import bodo
import time
n = 2 * 10**8
def calc_pi(n):
t1 = time.time()
x = 2 * np.random.ranf(n) - 1
y = 2 * np.random.ranf(n) - 1
t2 = time.time()
print("Initializing x,y takes: ", t2-t1)
pi = 4 * np.sum(x**2 + y**2 < 1) / n
print("calculation takes:", time.time()-t2, "\nresult:", pi)
return pi
bodo_calc_pi = bodo.jit(calc_pi)
print("python: ------------------")
calc_pi(n)
print("bodo: ------------------")
bodo_calc_pi(n)
```

The output is as follows:

```
python: ------------------
Initializing x,y takes: 3.9832258224487305
calculation takes: 1.1460411548614502
result: 3.14156454
bodo: ------------------
Initializing x,y takes: 3.0611653940286487
calculation takes: 0.35728363902308047
result: 3.14155538
```

Note

Note that Bodo execution took longer in the last example than previous ones, since the presence of timers in the middle of computation can inhibit some code optimizations (e.g. code reordering and fusion). Therefore, one should be cautious about adding timers in the middle of computation.

## 13.1. Disabling JIT Compilation¶

Sometimes it is convenient to disable JIT compilation without removing the jit decorators in the code, to enable easy performance comparison with regular Python or perform debugging. This can be done by setting the environment variable NUMBA_DISABLE_JIT to 1, which makes the jit decorators act as if they perform no operation. In this case, the invocation of decorated functions calls the original Python functions instead of compiled versions.